Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 11 results ...

Al-Sobiei, O S, Arditi, D and Polat, G (2005) Managing Owner’s Risk of Contractor Default. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(09), 973–8.

Gambatese, J A, Behm, M and Hinze, J W (2005) Viability of Designing for Construction Worker Safety. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(09), 1029–36.

Goodrum, P M and Dai, J (2005) Differences in Occupational Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities among Hispanic and Non-Hispanic Construction Workers. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(09), 1021–8.

Harper, D G and Bernold, L E (2005) Success of Supplier Alliances for Capital Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(09), 979–85.

Jiang, G and Shi, J (2005) Exact Algorithm for Solving Project Scheduling Problems under Multiple Resource Constraints. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(09), 986–92.

Kilian, J J and Gibson, G E (2005) Construction Litigation for the U.S. Naval Facilities Engineering Command, 1982–2002. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(09), 945–52.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: Construction industry; Litigation; Facilities; Claims; U.S. Navy;
  • ISBN/ISSN: 0733-9364
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:9(945)
  • Abstract:
    Evaluation of construction claims history can provide an understanding of improvement opportunities in a capital projects portfolio. This study analyzed cases of construction litigation involving the U.S. Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC) for the period of 1982–2002, extracted from the historical trial decision record of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA). The study provides trend data for all “first time” construction litigation cases brought before the Board over the last 21 years and a total of 666 cases involving NAVFAC construction contracts were identified over this period. The characterization of these cases was accomplished through a review and tabulation of ASBCA identified “primary” causes and a subjective analysis of “root” causes from a random sample extracted from the total population. The random sample data set totals 30 cases and was taken from cases litigated in the last 10 years (1993–2002). Findings and recommendations based on root causes, including specific recommendations are provided for NAVFAC and practitioners in other organizations.

Mohamed, Y and AbouRizk, S (2005) Technical Knowledge Consolidation using Theory of Inventive Problem Solving. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(09), 993–1001.

O’Connor, J T and Huh, Y (2005) Crew Production Rates for Contract Time Estimation: Bent Footing, Column, and Cap of Highway Bridges. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(09), 1013–20.

Riley, D R, Diller, B E and Kerr, D (2005) Effects of Delivery Systems on Change Order Size and Frequency in Mechanical Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(09), 953–62.

Wibowo, A and Kochendörfer, B (2005) Financial Risk Analysis of Project Finance in Indonesian Toll Roads. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(09), 963–72.

Yang, I (2005) Chance-Constrained Time–Cost Tradeoff Analysis Considering Funding Variability. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(09), 1002–12.